Most startups will face the prospect of a lower valuation than they wanted at some point. Which is why raising too much, too early, at too high a valuation, can really backfire on an entrepreneur. The common course correction is still doing an upround, albeit at a smaller number. This article will discuss the situations when even that compromise doesn’t work.
1) Flat Round – A flat round is simply starting from the old valuation. If your last post was 20 and you are now raising 5, then your pre is 20 and your new post is 25.
Three situations when a flat round typically happens:
Originally published on “Data Driven Investor," am happy to syndicate on other platforms. I am the Managing Partner and Cofounder of Tau Ventures with 20 years in Silicon Valley across corporates, own startup, and VC funds. These are purposely short articles focused on practical insights (I call it gl;dr -- good length; did read). Many of my writings are at https://www.linkedin.com/in/amgarg/detail/recent-activity/posts and I would be stoked if they get people interested enough in a topic to explore in further depth. If this article had useful insights for you comment away and/or give a like on the article and on the Tau Ventures’ LinkedIn page, with due thanks for supporting our work. All opinions expressed here are my own.
- market aka terms now are overall much less favorable than before
- timing aka you are running out of money and pressured to get it quickly
- traction aka the progress of the company doesn’t merit a higher valuation
- existing investors are not rewarded for taking an earlier risk
- employees are being diluted much more than if it was an upround
- the company signals a weaker position to the market which may affect future financing
- Warrants – the right to invest at previous terms
- Prorata – the right to invest in the future to maintain ownership
- Super Prorata – the right to invest in the future to not just maintain but increase ownership
- Graduated discount rate – if this round is a convertible then reward the investor for taking the risk by giving say a 15% discount if the company raises in 6 months, 15% in 9 months, 20% if it’s higher than that.
- Change of control – if the company gets sold within certain parameters, typically time and price, then investors will get a premium.
Originally published on “Data Driven Investor," am happy to syndicate on other platforms. I am the Managing Partner and Cofounder of Tau Ventures with 20 years in Silicon Valley across corporates, own startup, and VC funds. These are purposely short articles focused on practical insights (I call it gl;dr -- good length; did read). Many of my writings are at https://www.linkedin.com/in/amgarg/detail/recent-activity/posts and I would be stoked if they get people interested enough in a topic to explore in further depth. If this article had useful insights for you comment away and/or give a like on the article and on the Tau Ventures’ LinkedIn page, with due thanks for supporting our work. All opinions expressed here are my own.

I have been in Silicon Valley for 20 years -- at Samsung NEXT Ventures, running my own startup (as of May 2019 a series D that has raised $120M and valued at $450M), at Norwest Ventures, and doing product and analytics at Google. My academic training is BS in computer science and MS in biomedical informatics, both from Stanford, and MBA from Harvard. I speak natively 3 languages, live carbon-neutral, am a 70.3 Ironman finisher, and have built a hospital in rural India serving 100,000 people.
